iglesiasantateresita.com

President Barack Obama meets with French President Francois Hollande, Friday, May 18, 2012, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

President Barack Obama meets with French President Francois Hollande, Friday, May 18, 2012, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

(AP) ? President Barack Obama is using weekend gatherings of world leaders ? dominated by discussion of European economic woes and Afghanistan ? to solidify world resolve against development of an Iranian nuclear bomb and to encourage a more forceful response to worsening violence in Syria.

Obama will have the ear of key players on both issues during back-to-back G-8 and NATO summits. Discussion will be aimed directly and indirectly at Russia, a sometime protector of both Iran and Syria and the chief blockade to such U.S. goals as an arms embargo on Syria.

The gatherings come in the shadow of the eurozone debt crisis and plummeting public support for the war in Afghanistan. Political and economic chaos in Greece and Spain underscored just how fragile Europe’s economy remains after an eviscerating austerity regime. Germany’s finance minister predicted Friday that the crisis could last up to another two years.

Most of the leaders are part of overlapping international coalitions formed to address the Iranian nuclear problem and the newer crisis in Syria, where an estimated 9,000 people have died in more than a year of violence that arose from the pro-democracy Arab uprisings.

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev will be part of a discussion focused on Syria and Iran on Friday evening among the G-8 industrial nations. Faced with implacable Russian opposition to significant new United Nations punishments on the Syrian regime of President Bashar Assad, U.S. officials are trying to get consensus among other allies about ways to promote Assad’s ouster.

A senior U.S. official said one goal of Friday’s closed-door discussion at the secluded presidential retreat in Camp David, Md., was to impress on Medvedev that other nations that share Russia’s usual role at the forefront of international diplomacy are seeking ways to address the Syria debacle without Russian help.

The United States wants to avoid escalating a confrontation with Moscow over Syria, the official said, but wants Medvedev to hear the depth of international outrage. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal diplomacy.

Russia is a partner with the United States and European nations in containing Iran’s nuclear program, although with China it has blocked the most severe penalties the United Nations Security Council might impose. A U.N.-affiliated negotiating group including Russia will meet with Iranian officials next week in Baghdad, Iraq.

White House national security adviser Tom Donilon predicted ready consensus among the leaders that tough economic sanctions must continue even while a once-dormant diplomatic process shows new life. U.S. officials say the economic pressure of sanctions is key to drawing Iran back to the bargaining table this spring after a long hiatus.

“Each member of the G-8 is a core member of this sanctions effort,” Donilon said Thursday. “Each member has been absolutely essential to really putting in place what has been an extraordinarily effective and, I think most people would say, surprisingly effective sanctions effort.”

The G-8 gathering is expected to produce a statement by the leaders on Iran, which would reinforce the diplomatic effort to prevent Iran’s nuclear work from progressing to the point of a bomb. Iran denies it is seeking a bomb. A possible deal could allow Iran to enrich uranium at a lower level than needed to build weapons, with sanctions easing as Iran shows it is scaling back more troublesome work.

Iran says it is enriching only to create nuclear fuel. Its refusal to halt enrichment has provoked U.N. and other sanctions, including U.S. and European Union penalties meant to cripple its oil exports ? its main revenue source ? that are to fully take effect in a few weeks.

“The message will be that the Iranians should seize this opportunity” for talks, Donilon said. “And while this goes on, in parallel, the sanctions and pressure effort will continue, led by the United States and the others who will be at the table on Friday evening.”

Syria is a much harder case, in part because Russia and China oppose U.N. action that could set a precedent for outside interference in internal ethnic or human rights matters, and partly because there is no international appetite for a military confrontation with Assad.

Syrian forces on Friday fired on protesters holding the largest opposition marches yet in Aleppo, a sign of rising anti-regime sentiment in the country’s biggest city, which has largely remained supportive of President Bashar Assad throughout the 15-month uprising.

The head of the U.N. observer mission in Syria warned that neither his team nor armed action could solve the country’s crisis, and called on all sides to discuss a solution. But the regime kept up its assaults on opposition areas and protests, while the head of Syria’s largest exile opposition group dismissed the U.N.’s plan as unrealistic.

The White House abruptly moved the G-8 session to Camp David earlier this spring, after months of planning for a Chicago venue. A desire for seclusion and intimacy was one reason and a gesture to Russia was another.

Russia is opposed to a NATO plan for a missile defense shield in Europe that will be detailed at the NATO summit Sunday in Chicago, causing Russian President Vladimir Putin to let NATO know he did not want to be invited to the alliance meeting.

Separating the two sessions was supposed to make it easier for Putin to attend one and not the other. But Putin made his own abrupt change, telling Obama last week that he would skip the gathering and send Medvedev in his place.

The administration denied speculation that the sessions were moved for security reasons. Past G-8 meetings have seen large and sometimes violent protests by activists opposed to the increasing globalization of world economies. Street violence overshadowed the 2001 summit in Genoa, Italy. Critics have accused the G-8 of representing the interests of an elite group of industrialized nations to the detriment of the needs of the wider world. Since Genoa, the meetings have been held in increasingly isolated locations to shield leaders from protests, playing into criticism of the G-8′s closed-door image.

Obama, an infrequent visitor to Camp David, is putting the presidential hideaway on full display for the G-8, the largest gathering of foreign leaders ever to assemble there. The leaders will stroll leafy paths to rustic meetings halls and bed down in the 11 residential cabins. Four African leaders will join them for lunch Saturday.

The G-8 is made up of the leaders of the United States, Japan, Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Canada and Russia. The meetings began in 1975 at a forum instigated by France, where leaders of the six largest economic powers agreed to annual meetings. Canada joined a year later, making it the G-7. Russia was brought into the organization in 1997, six years after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The European Union is represented but is not granted the power to act as host of the annual sessions or to serve as the rotating leader.

Obama holds the chairmanship this year.

Associated Press

unclaimed money godspell media matters hana mountain lion taylor momsen xbox live update

President Obama shares a laugh with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg during a town hall meeting earlier this year on reducing the national debt.
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP

President Obama shares a laugh with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg during a town hall meeting earlier this year on reducing the national debt.

President Obama has done pretty well on Facebook. He recently told an audience at a San Francisco fundraiser that he has 19 million friends on the website, “which only puts me half a million friends behind SpongeBob SquarePants.”

The president’s chummy relationship is not just with Facebook users ? he’s also friendly with Facebook executives.

Politicians have many reasons to “friend” the social networking site, which connects them with voters and can help them raise money. Last week, the company announced that it is ramping up its presence in Washington with a slate of new hires. Also last week, President Obama met with Facebook’s founder and other tech leaders at the G-8 summit in France.

Critics say the blossoming friendship between Zuckerberg and President  Obama, shown together above, could ultimately hurt users of the social networking site.
Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty Images

Critics say the blossoming friendship between Zuckerberg and President Obama, shown together above, could ultimately hurt users of the social networking site.

An Overly Chummy Relationship?

During a town hall meeting at Facebook’s Palo Alto headquarters, Obama introduced himself as the man who got founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg to give up his trademark hooded sweatshirt for a jacket and tie.

“The first time we had dinner together, and he wore this jacket and tie,” said Obama, “halfway through the dinner he’s starting to sweat a little bit, it’s really uncomfortable for him, so I helped him out of his jacket.”

All this coziness makes some privacy activists uncomfortable.

“The Obama administration holds the keys to Facebook’s future,” says Jeff Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy. “I think the president should have been much more cautious when he stood up there with Mark Zuckerberg.”

Facebook has more than 600 million members, about half of whom visit the site more than once a day to share photographs, describe their feelings or “like” a band. All that activity means the company owns a huge amount of information about a huge number of people. And the rules for what the company can do with that information are still being written.

“Many members of Congress who will be weighing in on this issue are users of Facebook,” says Rey Ramsey, the CEO of TechNet, a political network of executives at tech companies, including Facebook.

If you don’t like your power company or your water company, in the United States you likely have very few alternatives. The same is true with social networking in this country and globally; Facebook dominates.

Ramsey says he believes politicians writing new Internet privacy rules can be impartial, even as those same politicians may depend on Facebook for fundraising and communications. After all, Ramsey says, the government regulates all kinds of industries that politicians use every day. “We use electricity, but we have an agency that oversees that.”

This concept of Facebook as a utility that people cannot live without in the modern world ? like electricity, water or gas ? is also gaining traction among Facebook’s critics.

“If you don’t like your power company or your water company, in the United States you likely have very few alternatives,” says Christine Rosen of the technology journal The New Atlantis. “The same is true with social networking in this country and globally; Facebook dominates.”

Rosen, who is also a scholar at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute, believes people are now using Facebook “as if they’re turning on a light switch or turning on their water, so I think it might be helpful to start thinking about some of the questions that raises about how the government should look at it.”

A Push For Stronger Privacy Rules

Facebook, which declined to comment for this story, does not like people to call it a utility. After all, anyone can create a competing social network. And more to the point, utilities are heavily regulated.

Already, the government is moving toward stronger privacy regulations online.

The Obama administration released a privacy policy framework last year, and a bill in the Senate looks similar to the administration proposal.

“When it comes to privacy, the administration has a split within its personality,” says Ohio State University Law professor Peter Swire. He was President Clinton’s privacy adviser and served as a lawyer to the Obama social media team during the presidential transition two years ago.

“The campaign was based on motivating people through social networks,” he says. “On the other hand, the administration is supporting unprecedented privacy protections. Working that out is tough for society, and it’s a split for the administration, as well.”

One administration official who works on these issues remarked that Facebook has disproportionately little contact with the White House compared with other big tech companies.

But Facebook is trying to change that. The recently announced hires are the first step to catching up with companies like Google and Microsoft in Washington.

Ed Black, CEO of the Computer and Communications Industry Association, argues that these growing ties will have no impact whatsoever on the ultimate set of privacy rules. “Can you really imagine that Facebook’s going to shut off one-third of the Congress who voted against them on something and not give them access? Do you realize how absolutely absurd that would be?”

While politicians do have an interest in using Facebook, they also have an interest in privacy. Elected officials are at least as worried as the rest of the world about what personal details of their lives online could someday be revealed.

Source: http://www.npr.org/2011/05/30/135783156/facebook-has-powerful-friends-will-users-suffer?ft=1&f=1019

john stamos flowers online kendra wilkinson invincible funny or die fahrenheit anderson